Google
×
The US government accused Microsoft of illegally monopolizing the web browser market for Windows, primarily through the legal and technical restrictions.
Autres questions
The Court finds the following facts to have been proved by a preponderance of the evidence. The Court shall state the conclusions of law to be drawn therefrom.
Microsoft was formally charged with constituting a market monopoly by making it difficult for users to install competing software.
Microsoft's campaign to blunt the browser threat further entrenched Microsoft's operating system monopoly. Microsoft could maintain its operating system ...
A discussion of three issues -- monopoly power, consumer injury, and remedies -- that are raised both by the Microsoft case and by other recent antitrust cases ...
Charges were brought against Microsoft to determine whether its bundling of additional programs into its operating system constituted monopolistic actions.
Microsoft was the antitrust case of the 1990s, and arguably from a policy perspective one of the most significant antitrust cases of the twentieth century.
14 nov. 2023 · The antitrust fight against Microsoft in the 1990s has loomed over the government's showdown with Google.
October 1998 – A consolidated antitrust case against Microsoft goes to trial before Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson in the U.S. District Court for the District of ...
In this case, after concluding that Microsoft had monopoly power, the District Court held that Microsoft had violated 2 by engaging in a variety of ...